Evaluasi Kinerja Pegawai dalam Meningkatkan Efisiensi dan Efektivitas Lingkungan Hidup
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.556442/eabmij.v7i02.995Keywords:
employee performance, efficiency, effectiveness, technology, trainingAbstract
This research aims to evaluate the performance of employees at the Environment, particularly in terms of efficiency and effectiveness. A qualitative approach was used with observation and documentation methods to collect data related to employee activities and official documents. The research results show that the employees' performance is generally good, but there are obstacles that need to be addressed. In terms of efficiency, the main obstacle is the lengthy bureaucratic process and the suboptimal use of technology due to limited technical training. Furthermore, the available work facilities do not fully support operational needs. Meanwhile, from the aspect of effectiveness, although several strategic programs, such as reforestation and waste management, have been successfully implemented, the achievement of quantity targets is still not optimal. This is caused by an uneven workload and excessive multitasking. To improve performance, strategic steps are needed such as streamlining bureaucratic processes, implementing digital technology, redistributing workloads, and developing needs-based training programs. In addition, providing incentives to high-performing employees can serve as motivation to improve performance. The results of this study provide practical recommendations in optimizing employee work efficiency and effectiveness. The implications of this research can also be used as a reference for other agencies in improving organizational performance sustainably.
References
Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2020). Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice (15th ed.). London: Kogan Page.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2013). Public Administration: An Action Orientation (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
Hood, C. (2015). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
Hasibuan, M. S. P. (2019). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Ivancevich, J. M., & Konopaske, R. (2013). Organizational Behavior and Management (10th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Mangkunegara, A. A. A. P. (2018). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan (Revised ed.). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (2017). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2020). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis – Into the Age of Austerity (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rachman, A., Sudarsono, S., & Mooduto, W. I. S. (2023). The relationship between discipline and employee performance in public institutions. Journal of Management Development, 42(5), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-12-2022-0412
Setiyono, B. (2014). Manajemen Publik dan Reformasi Birokrasi: Sebuah Pendekatan Strategis. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.
