Hybrid PV-Diesel-Battery System Performance in Tropical Malaysia: A Simulation Study

Authors

  • Abdullah Azraai bin Hasan Politeknik Muadzam Shah, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Nurul Afizah binti Adnan Politeknik Muadzam Shah, Pahang, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55642/eatij.v8i01.1262

Abstract

Hybrid renewable energy systems (HRES) combining photovoltaic (PV) modules, diesel generators, and battery storage represent a compelling solution for distributed electrification in tropical regions. The equatorial climate of Peninsular Malaysia—characterised by high humidity (RH ≥ 78%), temperatures above 27°C, and pronounced cloud-induced irradiance transients—imposes performance penalties that remain insufficiently quantified. This study presents a comprehensive techno-economic simulation analysis of a 250-kWp hybrid PV-diesel-battery system modelled for Muadzam Shah, Pahang, Malaysia (3.07° N, 103.08° E) using HOMER Pro v3.16.2. Simulation outputs were validated against published Malaysian PV benchmarks. Results showed a mean simulated PR of 0.748 (±0.018), system efficiency of 13.9%, and LCOE of MYR 0.42/kWh, representing a 31.5% cost reduction over a diesel-only baseline. The mean REF reached 65.8%. Thermal derating due to elevated cell temperatures (T_cell = 56–70°C) was responsible for a 9.8% power output reduction. A Malaysian-specific humidity correction model is proposed, reducing cell temperature prediction error by 51.2% relative to the standard NOCT model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kementerian Tenaga dan Sumber Asli Malaysia (2023). National Energy Transition Roadmap (NETR) 2023–2050. Putrajaya: KeTSA.

Suruhanjaya Tenaga (2024). Performance and Statistical Information: Electric Supply Industry in Malaysia 2023. Energy Commission of Malaysia, Putrajaya.

Kalogirou, S.A., Tripanagnostopoulos, Y., & Souliotis, M. (2005). Performance of solar systems employing collectors with colored absorber. Energy and Buildings, 37(8), 824–835.

Thevenard, D., & Pelland, S. (2013). Estimating the uncertainty in long-term photovoltaic yield predictions. Solar Energy, 91, 432–445.

IEC 61724-1:2021. Photovoltaic System Performance – Part 1: Monitoring. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva.

Reich, N.H., et al. (2012). Performance ratio revisited: Is PR > 90% realistic? Progress in Photovoltaics, 20(6), 717–726.

Kumar, M., & Kumar, A. (2017). Performance assessment and degradation analysis of solar photovoltaic technologies: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 554–587.

Khatib, T., Mohamed, A., & Sopian, K. (2013). A review of photovoltaic systems size optimization techniques. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 22, 454–465.

Diagne, M., et al. (2013). Review of solar irradiance forecasting methods and a proposition for small-scale insular grids. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 27, 65–76.

Green, M.A. (2002). Third generation photovoltaics: Ultra-high conversion efficiency at low cost. Progress in Photovoltaics, 9(2), 123–135.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-25